Team Knowles Nelson Updates: Oral Arguments, Media Reaction & Next Steps

Recap oral arguments and read up on media coverage.

Yesterday Knowles-Nelson finally had its day in court! The Wisconsin Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case that argues the legislature is violating the Wisconsin Constitution’s separation of powers when members of the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) anonymously block conservation projects. 

Gathering Waters’ attorneys were right there alongside the Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) to present our arguments to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Our attorneys and DOJ forcefully argued that the veto authority over Knowles-Nelson grants that JFC has given itself is unconstitutional.  They drove home the point that the JFC’s actions have had real consequences for conservation projects across Wisconsin. And they made a strong case that allowing anonymous committee members to have unchecked veto power goes against the separation of powers outlined in our state’s constitution. 

A remarkable exchange between Justice Karofsky and the Legislature’s attorney, Misha Tseytlin, illustrates just how far the committee’s overreach has extended. Inquiring about the lack of limits on committee members’ ability to veto Knowles-Nelson projects, Karofsky asked:

“Could the Joint Committee on Finance hold a Knowles-Nelson proposal in abeyance in perpetuity?”

“Are they obligated to consider any statutorily recognized interest in land conservation when they do that?

“Are they required to articulate a reason, any reason? Or are they required to issue a decision when they exercise their veto power?

“Is it appealable or reviewable?”

Karofsky ended her line of questioning by saying, “I don’t understand what processes, what procedures, what policy determinations the Joint Committee on Finance needs to make in order to veto a proposal. I mean, there doesn’t seem to me to be any limits whatsoever. There are zero guardrails here.”

Tseytlin responded, “Your Honor, there’s no gainsaying that.”

That complete lack of accountability and guardrails that Karofsky’s questions illustrate is why we went to court yesterday. 

We’re expecting a decision from the court in late June or early July, and we’re hopeful that it could lead to big changes in the way the JFC review process works.

But here’s the thing – no matter what the court decides, we will keep advocating for our ability to protect Wisconsin’s land and water. The Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program is a bipartisan success story that shows just how much Wisconsinites value our natural resources. Even when we disagree on other issues, we can all get behind the idea of protecting the places that make our state so special.

Thank you for your support. Together, we’re going to keep advocating for a Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program that operates with fairness and transparency.

In case you missed it…

Watch yesterday’s oral arguments via WisconsinEye. To view the archived video you will need to create a free user account. 

Read up on what the media is saying. Here’s roundup of news coverage following yesterday’s oral arguments: 

Stay informed by checking out resources and following along for updates here on

– CharlieMorgan, and all your advocates at Gathering Waters

Share this post

Wooden judge's gavel sitting on top of a white marble table.
Supreme Court

WI Environmental Groups Celebrate Supreme Court Ruling

Midwest Environmental Advocates and Clean Wisconsin, both of which filed amicus briefs in the separation of powers lawsuit, praised the court’s decision that a statute allowing the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) to block Knowles-Nelson projects is unconstitutional.

Read More »
Team Knowles Nelson badge with a bird taking flight.

Thanks! We'll keep you in the loop about Team Knowles Nelson.