The majority opinion held that the Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee can no longer obstruct conservation projects through anonymous objections and indefinite delays, deeming such actions unconstitutional.
This is a resounding victory that puts the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program back on track!
The Court’s near-unanimous decision, which crossed ideological lines, reaffirms the separation of powers and removes legislative obstacles to conservation efforts. This broad consensus underscores that the ruling is about good governance and constitutional integrity, not partisan politics.
Governor Tony Evers emphasized the ruling’s importance:
“Republican lawmakers have spent years giving themselves outsized influence and power that they’ve used to unconstitutionally obstruct basic government functions and prevent my administration from doing the people’s work. And that includes preventing the implementation of the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program. That ends today.
“I’ve spent years working against near-constant Republican obstruction, and this historic decision rightfully resets constitutional checks and balances and restores separation of powers. This decision is a victory for the people of Wisconsin, who expect and deserve their government to work—and work for them, not against them.”
This victory is the result of years of collective effort. We thank every Team Knowles Nelson supporter, Wisconsin’s land trusts, the Evers administration, Josh Kaul and Colin Roth from the Department of Justice, and our legal team led by Erin Deeley at Stafford Rosenbaum.
Looking Ahead
We’re already setting our sights on the next state budget debate in 2025 when funding for Knowles-Nelson will be up for reauthorization. We may face opposition from some legislators unhappy with this ruling, but we must remind them that Knowles-Nelson is broadly and enthusiastically supported by residents in every corner of the state, regardless of their party affiliation. Conservation is not a partisan issue. It’s about preserving Wisconsin’s natural heritage for future generations.
Background
In October 2023, Governor Evers and the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the WI legislature, arguing that the Joint Finance Committee’s (JFC) practice of arbitrarily vetoing Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program grant approvals through anonymous objections violates the separation of powers outlined in the WI constitution. The JFC’s current practice allows for a single anonymous committee member to halt any grant for any reason, essentially giving an unchecked veto authority to any anonymous member of the committee.
Gathering Waters intervened in the case as a co-plaintiff. Our member land trusts have frequently had their grants sabotaged by arbitrary, anonymous objections. Wisconsin land trusts rely on the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program to support land conservation, and the broken JFC review process undermines land trusts’ ability to conserve important conservation lands for future generations. Therefore, we chose to intervene in the case in order to tell the Knowles-Nelson story and to add our own legal arguments to those being presented by DOJ.
Want to learn more? Read the affidavit that we submitted to the court. The affidavit describes, in detail, how the broken review process has limited land trusts’ ability to protect the places that make WI special.
Resources
Watch oral arguments from April 17th at WisconsinEye. To view the archived video you will need to create a free user account.
All of the documents related to the case are posted on the WI Supreme Court’s website, though the site can be tricky to navigate. Here are direct links to some of the key documents:
-
- Governor Evers’ press release announcing the lawsuit.
-
- DOJ petition for original action. This is the legal argument that DOJ submitted to the court when it asked the court to take the case.
-
- Respondent’s opening brief. This is the legal argument the legislature’s attorneys submitted in response to DOJ.
Several groups have also submitted what are called “amicus briefs,” which are sometimes referred to as “friend of the court” briefs. Amicus briefs come from groups that have an interest in the case but are not directly involved as plaintiff or defendant.
Amicus briefs supporting DOJ and Gathering Waters have been submitted by:
-
- Law Forward on behalf of several retired judges
-
- State Democracy Research Initiative at the UW Law School
Amicus briefs opposing DOJ and Gathering Waters have been submitted by:
Not sure where to start? We’ve summarized the key points from the documents above to make the arguments in the case more accessible to all of us who aren’t lawyers.
Read More
Senator rallies support for program county knows well
Habush Sinykin urges defense of Stewardship Program that has funded several Ozaukee preservation projects.
Wisconsin conservation faces partisan uncertainty
The Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program faces an uncertain future as Republicans signal the program’s end while Governor Evers proposes $1 billion in funding.
Audubon Society pushes lawmakers to protect stewardship funds
In recent years, the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program has become a flashpoint in the fight over the boundary between the executive and legislative branches of state government.
As advocates call for conservation funding, Wisconsin’s stewardship program faces steep odds
The Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program may be in jeopardy of reauthorization.
‘It’s worth fighting for’: Habush Sinykin speaks out on behalf of Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program
Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin held a community conversation about the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program, which she said is in jeopardy in the current state budget cycle.
Here are environmental issues that could wind up before the Wisconsin Supreme Court
After Susan Crawford’s victory in the state Supreme Court race, environmental advocates are looking at cases that could be taken up in the coming years and how the court’s liberal majority could impact those issues.
